Why does this page look like this? Your browser has become outdated and does not support recent web standards. You're welcome to use this page as is, although we suggest upgrading your browser. This page is designed to look it's best in Firefox & Safari although it will work as intended in the latest version of most popular browsers.

Perhaps downloading the PDF of the article will display better for you.

downsize

There are 3 main reasons why lower priced property often has a higher depreciation ratio in relation to the purchase price.

Firstly, "wet areas" (kitchen, bathroom, etc) are more expensive to build in comparison to bedrooms, per square metre.

Given a one-bedroom apartment still has a kitchen and bathroom, increasing the number of bedrooms (which are cheaper to build), means the construction cost - as a ratio - decreases.

Secondly, white goods in these areas depreciate at both a higher and quicker rate than brickwork and concrete.

So, as you add more bedrooms / other rooms into the mix - you reduce the effectiveness of these highly depreciable items.

The third reason relates to land value.

We see numerous projects where the ratio of construction cost to purchase price is roughly 50/50.

But when you look at the more luxurious end of the market, there is only so much building you can physically put on the land.

For example, a recent landmark sale in Bondi saw $4M paid for a 100m2 block of land. True story! Yet, it would be difficult to spend $2m on the construction of this property - even using gold plated taps!

Headshot: Tyron Hyde

Tyron Hyde is a director of quantity surveying firm Washington Brown. He is regarded as one of the industry’s leading experts in property tax depreciation, is regularly quoted in the media and is asked to speak at conferences.